Speaking of "propaganda" and then using the argument "they have admited guilt in the past, therefore any future action must be malevolent" is interesting...

Just because green energy became as cheap as fossil and they can afford to switch without sacrificing profits doesn't mean they are taking "climate action". It's the same as if I claimed credit for "climate action" because I am paying energy tax. I am not saying this is malevolent. But it's at best neutral.

That's not to say that management is not incentivised to optimise for profit.

They can easily do that in exchange for enhanced employee satisfaction and good public relations, with all the financial benefits those bring.

„Profit seeking entity“ is a far fetch considering Bosch is a foundation...

Strictly speaking Bosch GmbH, though majority owned by Bosch Stiftung, is a separate entity.

You know. They could also decide to just not do it and then everyone is worse off.