News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The word “lox” hasn't changed in sound or meaning in 8k y... by tdeck on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @09:39PM (#19915623)
But the German "ch" phoneme doesn't even exist in (American) English?
Re:The word “lox” hasn't changed in sound or meaning in 8k y... by anyfoo on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @10:02PM (#19915762)
In this chase, "ch" is pronounced as "k", not as one of the two German ch-phonemes that don't exist in English.
Re:The word “lox” hasn't changed in sound or meaning in 8k y... by asynchrony on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @09:47PM (#19915672)
It's not pronounced from the throat like the German "ch" but otherwise it's as close as it gets.
Re:The word “lox” hasn't changed in sound or meaning in 8k y... by anyfoo on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @10:04PM (#19915776)
There are (at least?) three different ways "ch" can be pronounced in German: Throaty as in "Buch", a slightly altered "sh" sound like in "Bücher", and just as plain "k", like in "Lachs".
Re:The word “lox” hasn't changed in sound or meaning in 8k y... by posterboy on Thursday May 16, 2019 @02:52PM (#19931819)
I was very surprised to see wiktionaries phonetic transcription and sound sample of "Buch", apparently it is not throaty everywhere.

It's a /k/ in all "-achs", e.g. "Dachs", "wachsen", "Flachs", exactly as in "bochs" the emulator (compare "boxen"), except across boundaries, e.g. "wachsam, wach-sam" (wakeful, at guard), or contractions, e.g. "[Meister seines].Faches/Fachs".