If you are interviewing Facebook execs or management it would seem reasonable to question their ethics.
> I think it's a little far to suggest that any rank and file ENGINEER would have compromised ethics just from choosing to work there. Facebook uses cutting edge tech and pays really well,
I give people benefit of the doubt, recognize that sometimes we have to compromise, etc., but let's not hand out ethical freebies in advance.
If the engineers quit, the company can't do it anymore.
They are all accomplices. For whatever reason they don't stop and thus their ethics are compromised.
They should have the ability to think about the ethical impact of their work, or have awoken to the necessity.
“never thought about it” is a worse answer than “I’m OK with it.” I may not hire someone who answers the later, but I can respect them for having a thoughtful answer.
that's the point. If they are continuing in any way to benefit the operation of a business that does those things then they are morally corrupt.
The prestige is that they are hard to get into so if you made it you passed their bar and you probably had some impact there and learned good process that you can bring to a usually less disciplined startup.
I find copyright and patents to be unethical. Probably not many people I could hire if I employed a similar tactic.