News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules antitrust lawsuit against Apple can p... by cataphract on Monday May 13, 2019 @05:43PM (#19904288)
The proposal more often floated around is an 18-year term limit (see https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=701121 ), which would give each president 2 appointments.

The big difficult, however, is how to make sure that a hostile senate wouldn't just block all nominations (which is the new norm). Some people like Calabresi have suggested that the president and everyone in the senate would be denied all compensation (IIRC even from private parties) until the seat is filled. I don't think that's a workable idea though.

Re:Supreme Court rules antitrust lawsuit against Apple can p... by dragonwriter on Monday May 13, 2019 @06:18PM (#19904565)
The simple way to stop the Senate from just blocking everything (which it does by not scheduling a vote, to avoid accountability of individual senators to voting down qualified candidates) is to reshape their confirmation power to a power to actively reject.
Re:Supreme Court rules antitrust lawsuit against Apple can p... by kkarakk on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @09:11AM (#19909099)
would it even matter when presidents are now billionaires in their own right?