Re:The Maker of Gore-Tex Is Experimenting With an Artificial...
by zzzzzzzza on Saturday May 11, 2019 @01:57AM
(#19884803)
neither income nor consumption should be taxed, instead, consider taxing that which we do not produce via the work of our own hands, such as land value (which ultimately comes from nature/the productivity of the surrounding community).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Maker of Gore-Tex Is Experimenting With an Artificial...
by weeksie on Saturday May 11, 2019 @07:51AM
(#19885717)
I'm always here for the Georgist takes. Wish the LVT was as politically feasible as a VAT.
Re:The Maker of Gore-Tex Is Experimenting With an Artificial...
by ShorsHammer on Saturday May 11, 2019 @06:36AM
(#19885527)
Consumption should very much be taxed considering it is the simplest way to claw back all the environmental externalities in an ever polluted world with no one willing to take responsibility.
Re:The Maker of Gore-Tex Is Experimenting With an Artificial...
by zzzzzzzza on Saturday May 11, 2019 @12:03PM
(#19886799)
if you really want to do that levy a carbon tax or a packaging tax or something more direct
a consumption tax would also penalize transactions that might decrease environmental impact e.g. solar panels, or of tools used in the construction of a composting toilet, those being easy, obvious examples.