zzzzzzzza
and it's not even like your new discrimination is symmetric to the old one.
just bad ethics.
> Can you see how you've possibly and probably just reinforced existing sexism?
yea nope you are right I agree you are sexist for insisting on doing the tie breaker on the basis of gender rather than experience. this is exactly what I am talking about. And people that will feel it the most are the newcomers.
> It's hard to even find women to interview, let alone hire.
from my perspective this is a subtle admission of active positive discrimination on your part, frankly if i was a woman maybe i would find it a little off putting that a bunch of old guys were real keen to get me under their supervision
if there is a movement to get men into nursing, it's not nearly as vocal (and why would there be?)
sincerely, someone that doesn't work in the industry (directly) but has college education in it and who does it as a hobby but doesn't feel wanted or welcome by big tech
(also don't have the karma to downvote you and between our two comments which do you think will actually get downvotes)
people getting into the industry may feel very differently from you. not sure if you are aware but colleges are like 66% female now lol.
there's plenty of venues where you can find people advocating for those lifestyles, hn shouldn't be. the replies to this should be something more like "wrote my own emacs extension" or maybe like "took venture capital from some specific vc" or something...
this kind of ironic self hatred stuff is a big part of why leaving reddit is on my list...
leaving reddit
avoiding marriage&kids (okay actually i only bring it up cuz the default replies seemed incredibly un hacker news to me, more like boomer news "religion, marriage, kids" lol, bruh one of my college buddies is big into religion and now he is married and has a kid and he used to be almost as smart as me now he probly couldn't program his way out of paper bag)
keeping a productivity computer where I have youtube&hacker news banned via host file
Now I guess you could consider me a deist, since I think if we are going to define God as some kind of infinite extension of some aspect of humanity then God would have to be a hyper turing machine then in my estimation.
Seems like such a thing could not exist in this universe, but I do actually choose to, loosely, believe something along that line exists, but we couldn't actually interact with or understand an entity like that... on like a mathematical level we couldn't.
So I explicitly disbelieve in a personal god of any kind. There could be a demiurge but I see no reason why it would have moral authority or anything, maybe it could torture you endlessly I guess XD.
is the second top level bullet point out of 8 top level bullet points
in some scenarious even taxing third homes could ultimately reduce the supply of housing
a land value tax on the other hand...
1. maintain and improve your emacs&nixos configurations,
2. create a personal database and add new capabilities to it (for example you could start by making a database to track github stars that could for instance store hashes of specific commits)
3. with your newfound data model and programmable/configurable environment, slowly integrate AI into your life
would different users have different schemas in their vcs db? would every pull request be a db migration XD?
actually i wrote a couple tables/stored procedures that (should probably mostly) do this for postgres after looking at some other patch management libraries by depesz and steve purcell a couple weeks ago
it's a comparison/analogy?
1. chat subscription only
2. i have paid for api calls but don't have a subscription
and only #2 currently has gpt4 available in the playground
I doubt there is any risk adjusted alpha to the strategy - in practice it's my, newbie, understanding that the only thing that differentiates such strategies in the broader scheme of things is tax efficiency.
however I am also not a ML expert
something modular like framework laptop would work well