Urban trees will almost assuredly, like all of the other lifeforms we grow and rely on, be altered through human selection (be it simple old techniques like cross breeding, or advanced techniques like genetic modification)
i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_tree
I will admit it's handy when planting on my eighth acre to know ahead of time how big a tree will get, for example.
In a way it will be survival of the fittest for trees. Unfortunately it might take considerable work from urban planners which I cannot see happening on a large scale any time soon.
Maybe a better idea will be to selectively breed species in hard environments and then distribute the seeds to cities that need them. With genetic modifications becoming prevalent in the food industry this might be not far away from happening.
What if the "fittest" trees end up being the ugliest or most allergy-triggering?
My point is if its run by humans, it probably won't really be survival of the "fittest".
>In a way it will be survival of the fittest for trees. Unfortunately it might take considerable work from urban planners which I cannot see happening on a large scale any time soon.
I greatly look forward to Cambridge trees that wake up at 10am toke it up 'til noon and complain about life being hard, New Bedford trees that pack heat, Boston trees that think they're the center of the universe and other environment specific adaptations.
https://arbordayblog.org/treeoftheweek/london-planetree-toug...
Only problem is that at least in my area, they constantly shed leaves, all season long.
EDIT: Looks like someone also mentioned the london plane before me