Flutter: a Portable UI Framework for Mobile, Web, Embedded, and Desktop

Re:Flutter: a Portable UI Framework for Mobile, Web, Embedde... by bradhoffman on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @08:52PM (#19854901)

I have not. I didn’t want to put the time into learning the .NET stack and C# because I am from a .NET town and did not want to get stuck here. What're your thoughts on it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flutter: a Portable UI Framework for Mobile, Web, Embedde... by JamesSwift on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @10:07PM (#19855310)

I'm a native dev that is aggressively against the JS-based hybrid frameworks, and I will do every project in Xamarin from now on after working in it for a greenfield project. It's the best option out there until Kotlin Native gets legs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flutter: a Portable UI Framework for Mobile, Web, Embedde... by mixmastamyk on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @01:42AM (#19856148)

Flutter has no js, or are you speaking about something else?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flutter: a Portable UI Framework for Mobile, Web, Embedde... by gwbas1c on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @10:17PM (#19855359)

C# is quickly becoming the "new C" in that it runs everywhere, and runs efficiently.

It's worth learning the language because you can use it in so many places. It's not a case of "learn a new language for platform xxx."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flutter: a Portable UI Framework for Mobile, Web, Embedde... by Cyph0n on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @11:27PM (#19855635)

I think you mean the new Java. C and C# are very different beasts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flutter: a Portable UI Framework for Mobile, Web, Embedde... by SneakerXZ on Thursday May 09, 2019 @01:53PM (#19870487)

He is right. You should check more about C# before you correct others.

[ Parent | on HN ]