1. Execute the company (dissolve the charter)
    2. throw the board collectively in jail for a time for inaction of illegal actions leading to death
    3. charge all who conspired to subvert laws as a co-conspirators to premeditated murder
    4. Liquidate the company and pay back shareholders not in C levels, the Board, family thereof, or people charged with aforementioned crimes

Strong enough?

Why would you pay back shareholders?

How about just jail the programmers and engineers since they are the only ones who ever have a record of what went on.

Wouldn't be the first time programmers were the only ones to do time for a company's crimes.

But when I'm asked to implement robosigning and push back now I'm the bad guy. I won't do it, but another dev did against my and the other developer's advice. He'll be fine I'm sure. No one will notice.

And it's not hard at all to see different pieces done, which individually do not make a crime. However these 10 pieces (read: Agile cards) do make illegal actions possible.

The management approved this, and the devs worked on it. The devs certainly didn't execute said code. Now, if they were discussing "this feature allows fraud but we're going to do it anyway" over jira or email, roast'em.

Banning the 737 Max from flying in the U.S. forever would be a good start, I'm thinking. It could be a decent lesson for airplane makers (and self-driving car makers) at least.

Why not just ban all of Boeing's planes from flying? That would teach Boeing an even greater lesson.

> Do that until all the 737max's are fixed and I bet they are fixed in a hurry.

Because fixed in a hurry is what you want in that situation?

Presumably only the 737 MAX is the result of a bad-faith design process.

The knee-jerk is strong with this one.

Sometimes glad we don't have direct democracy or mob rule.

I believe that you missed the /s implied at the end.

Yeah, I actually thought it was meant literally...