Re:Facebook Bans Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, InfoWar...
by Consultant32452 on Thursday May 02, 2019 @09:59PM
(#19814843)
Let's not forget that the SCOTUS has ruled Twitter is an official communications platform of the White House. Therefore Trump is not able to block people. It's a weird legal ruling, and it's hard to imagine this doesn't have implications for the rest of us. Can Twitter block you from participating in official White House communications?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook Bans Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, InfoWar...
by belltaco on Thursday May 02, 2019 @11:00PM
(#19815148)
I think the difference is that you can still read Trump's tweets if you're banned from Twitter, but you cannot read Trump's tweets if you're blocked by Trump on Twitter.
Re:Facebook Bans Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, InfoWar...
by Consultant32452 on Thursday May 02, 2019 @11:02PM
(#19815159)
What is the difference between viewing Trump's tweets while logged out because Trump blocked you, and viewing Trump's tweets while logged out because Twitter banned you?
Re:Facebook Bans Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, InfoWar...
by razius on Friday May 03, 2019 @03:05AM
(#19816200)
But you cannot participate in the discussion, that's the point.
Re:Facebook Bans Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, InfoWar...
by tropo on Thursday May 02, 2019 @10:21PM
(#19814948)
It's more than weird. It's a crazy ruling.
The press room in the Whitehouse is an official communications platform of the White House. With that ruling as precedent, can I barge in there? I can even behave better than Jim Acosta.