News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UK police secretly downloading content from suspects’ pho... by pjc50 on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @11:24AM (#19788771)
I was a campaigner against ID cards back then, and this is basically spot on: even back then, the people on the street who supported ID cards mentioned immigration. What happened? The biometric residence permits. ID cards are mandatory if you're a non-EU immigrant. The rest of the "hostile environment" made proof of immigration status mandatory for employment and renting a house. We got all the pieces of a surveillance state except the ID cards - because that's what the public wanted.

All of the Windrush fiasco and other Home Office outrages show that the UK is pretty comfortable with bureaucratic authoritarianism so long as they think it only applies to immigrants.

Re:UK police secretly downloading content from suspects’ pho... by KevanM on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @12:14PM (#19789264)
Excuse me if I have a simplistic view of this, but wouldn't an ID card have helped Windrush citizens prove their citizenship?
Re:UK police secretly downloading content from suspects’ pho... by pjc50 on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @02:47PM (#19790741)
Perhaps - assuming they could get one in the first place. Alternatively the application process could have simply accelerated their deportation. Things might have gone better under the Blair government, but the whole point of ID cards is to impose the state's view on everyone's status.
Re:UK police secretly downloading content from suspects’ pho... by fauigerzigerk on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @01:35PM (#19790074)
Indeed it would have. I think the worst kinds of surveillance mechanisms are the ones that can cause a lot of suspicion and false positives, but don't allow those affected to refute any allegations. Identity documents are not like that at all. On the contrary.