Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by veridies on Sunday April 28, 2019 @07:23PM
(#19774491)
I wish Ardour had some of the features Logic does (most significantly flex time), as well as a nicer UI. Literally Logic is the only thing keeping me on macOS.
Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by lostgame on Sunday April 28, 2019 @08:43PM
(#19774926)
That, Final Cut, and the occasional need to use Xcode.
Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by bgorman on Sunday April 28, 2019 @08:41PM
(#19774914)
Bitwig has a Linux version now.
Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by jameskegel on Monday April 29, 2019 @07:57AM
(#19777498)
It always has
Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by jsjsjsjsjsjs on Monday April 29, 2019 @05:17AM
(#19776898)
Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by swiley on Sunday April 28, 2019 @08:21PM
(#19774820)
Linux audio latency really isn't great, having another layer in between your app and the kernel probably won't help.
Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by Sangeppato on Sunday April 28, 2019 @09:12PM
(#19775044)
It's actually quite good, or at the least it's better than Windows 10 on the same hardware for me, even if using wine (Apple is still the best here obviously)
Re:Darling – macOS Translation Layer for Linux
by michaelmrose on Monday April 29, 2019 @02:01AM
(#19776172)
Its actually fine and has been for a long long while. Pulseaudio kind of sucked when it first came out.
It's usefulness is entirely limited to the implementation of the core library frameworks such as Core Image, Audio, MIDI, Animation, Data, etc...which will be very, very difficult, I think, while maintaining FOSS status.