Re:Study finds Reddit’s ban of its most toxic subreddits wor...
by pmarreck on Monday April 29, 2019 @10:25AM
(#19778596)
If you don’t believe in free speech on principle, I’m sure China and North Korea will take you, because you don’t belong in a Western democracy
Re:Study finds Reddit’s ban of its most toxic subreddits wor...
by berrynice on Monday April 29, 2019 @01:33PM
(#19780541)
I believe in the freedom of the people I agree with to speak, this argument is obviously absurd.
Re:Study finds Reddit’s ban of its most toxic subreddits wor...
by 8note on Sunday April 28, 2019 @07:45PM
(#19774624)
which is demonstrably not true? that belief in free speech assumes the right arguments winning, or that the right arguments win?
Re:Study finds Reddit’s ban of its most toxic subreddits wor...
by berrynice on Monday April 29, 2019 @01:34PM
(#19780556)
That the right arguments win.
Re:Study finds Reddit’s ban of its most toxic subreddits wor...
by fzeroracer on Sunday April 28, 2019 @06:42PM
(#19774204)
Hell, we can look at Voat and Gab as well for example of sites where absolute free speech as a principle has failed to result in any sort of good outcome.
Conveniently these sites are ignored or handwaved away or are somehow only because of censorship.
Re:Study finds Reddit’s ban of its most toxic subreddits wor...
by berrynice on Sunday April 28, 2019 @07:12PM
(#19774420)
Yeah I used to use Voat right after /r/conspiracy started getting scared, things were civil and small scale and I had some fruitful discussions, that went to hell once the racist subs started getting hit.
This is demonstrably not the case. Just look at the chans.