News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Don't Have a Talent Shortage. We Have a Sucker Shortage by peteradio on Saturday April 20, 2019 @03:25PM (#19708398)
You are supposed to lie to inflate your salary even more? So rather than offer of 60% current pay they'd be offering 30% wink wink current pay. I hope you no longer communicate with that recruiter.
Re:We Don't Have a Talent Shortage. We Have a Sucker Shortage by d4mi3n on Saturday April 20, 2019 @04:19PM (#19708657)
This is common practice, but it’s playing into a bad power dynamic where the employer is trying to anchor the negotiation to a number. It’s a predatory question, and giving a bullshit answer to a bullshit question is a reasonable response.

As I mentioned in another comment, I personally prefer just setting a salary range I’d be willing to accept. I walk away if given an offer below that range. It gives me the initiative of anchoring the negotiation to a number I want.

It also saves me a lot of time by screening out companies that aren’t willing to actually negotiate.

Re:We Don't Have a Talent Shortage. We Have a Sucker Shortage by jpdb on Saturday April 20, 2019 @04:57PM (#19708826)
So why not just tell them a number, because the company is going to go for the lowest in the range anyways?
Re:We Don't Have a Talent Shortage. We Have a Sucker Shortage by revvx on Saturday April 20, 2019 @05:05PM (#19708877)
You can ALWAYS negotiate before you accept the offer.

"Yeah thanks, but that offer is not enough for me to leave my current job. I need at least X more. Let me know if you're interested."

(In fact, you can negotiate even AFTER you accept it!)