5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by zjaffee on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @03:57PM (#19676753)

Think for a moment about how big of an impact 4g had, and 3g before it. As others mentioned above about the law that states that any new computing resource will eventually get filled, there are plenty of areas where this is worthwhile.

The biggest first off would likely be the end of wifi as we know it, so in turn, an increasing number of IoT devices for the home/workplace/elsewhere would be built without the need for complicated wifi setup, and all syncing between devices would likely be done using a cellular setup. "Cable" would likely completely go away, where companies like Verizon realize they can deliver all TV over their 5g network. The constraints relating to numbers of devices on a wifi router will be backgrounded, ect.

Another key piece is that there will be far more nodes in a 5g deployment, so you could do better triangulation for GPS. It will have lower latency so even tighter real time applications can be done over the internet. This list can go on and on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by omni on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @04:04PM (#19676808)

> the end of wifi as we know it

Can you explain what specifically about 5G makes this possible? I don't know anything about it, but if the logistics and pricing for it are anything like 4G, I have no interest in paying my telecom an extra $5/mo per device when I can throw them on my own network for free.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by TylerE on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @04:08PM (#19676840)

Because potentially "your network" goes away. You have no home-based "line".

I'm skeptical, very, but the appeal is obvious if it works and the pricing isn't obscene.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by viraptor on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @04:13PM (#19676884)

The pricing will be higher than 4G. The data caps will stay similar. Carriers are not charities and don't operate at cost - if they can charge us for extra value, they will.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by subway on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @04:21PM (#19676958)

s/for extra value//

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by omni on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @07:29PM (#19678249)

Why don't I have a home-based line? Are routers illegal now or something? Are the receivers locked down and proprietary? Is someone taking my computer away?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by nightfly on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @04:17PM (#19676923)

What are wireless providers gonna allow these new IoT devices on their network for free? Are they suddenly gonna stop making us pay through the nose for bandwidth on our phones? Is tethering not gonna exist, or not be an extra $20 per month charge?

I don't see any of these things happening with 5G.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by wffurr on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @04:23PM (#19676975)

How big of an impact did 4G really have? I had Google Maps and text messaging on 2G. Now I can mindlessly scroll through high res feeds full of memes too?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:5G Is Likely to Put Weather Forecasting at Risk by kiwijamo on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @07:34PM (#19687358)

I remember mapping being really slow on 2G. 3G improved things but peak time would see issues. 4G finally saw mapping work well 99% of the time for me since the speeds were always good enough.

[ Parent | on HN ]