Re:Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg Addresses the Ethiopian Airl...
by mveety on Thursday April 04, 2019 @07:14PM
(#19578055)
The problem with dealing with a departure stall is they’re extremely deadly, happen faster than a person can react to, and are in general unrecoverable all because of the lack of altitude. If it was the case that you could easily deal with a departure stall in the 737-MAX then they would have seen no need to implement MCAS.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg Addresses the Ethiopian Airl...
by cjbprime on Thursday April 04, 2019 @09:25PM
(#19578816)
MCAS only operates with flaps up, though, so it's actually irrelevant during most departure stalls at low altitude.
Re:Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg Addresses the Ethiopian Airl...
by stirlo on Thursday April 04, 2019 @07:25PM
(#19578140)
Even if you could recover without MCAS Boeing still wouldn’t have released a version without it as the recovery procedure have needed new training.
Let’s not forget MCAS only exists to protect Boeing’s profits by avoiding a new type certification.
Re:Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg Addresses the Ethiopian Airl...
by subculture on Thursday April 04, 2019 @08:39PM
(#19578549)
And if Boeing had originally went with a new type certification, the plane they'd build wouldn't need MCAS. The MAX can't exist without something like MCAS, can it?