Re:A16Z is re-registering as a financial advisor, renouncing...
by turkeysandwich on Thursday April 04, 2019 @10:44AM
(#19572893)
The only thing the democracy index gets right are the broad strokes. But then again, so could a high schooler with wikipedia and a free afternoon.
It's not implemented well enough to detect the fine differences between western countries.
Hate speech laws reduce the range of discourse. They suppress dissent. That's inherently undemocratic.
Re:A16Z is re-registering as a financial advisor, renouncing...
by late2part on Friday April 05, 2019 @11:41PM
(#19589057)
I think the reason so many people feel that it's important to allow dissenting and objectionable speech is that the perception of 'harmful' speech is mostly subjective.
Relegating that permissiveness to a particular entity allows that subjectivity to be enforced in perverse ways.
Many people feel it is better to tolerate the objectionable and hurtful speech than to allow a 3rd party to use subjective judgment to censor.
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index
[2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech