News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A16Z is re-registering as a financial advisor, renouncing its status as a VC. Parent comment

Re:A16Z is re-registering as a financial advisor, renouncing... by turkeysandwich on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @07:16PM (#19568038)
Western democracies with hate speech laws are less democratic because the range of legally permissible opinions is smaller.

If mere functioning is your goal for the country, then certainly countries without strong free speech protections can function. They can even function without democracy at all.

But most people want more for their country.

Western democracies with weaker free speech protections do function, but they also have a substantial pressure outlet in the form of websites hosted in other countries that don't kowtow to oppressive governments.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A16Z is re-registering as a financial advisor, renouncing... by slg on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @07:49PM (#19568205)
Cross reference this list[1] with this one[2]. I just don't see any evidence for a claims like "Western democracies with hate speech laws are less democratic".

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index

[2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A16Z is re-registering as a financial advisor, renouncing... by turkeysandwich on Thursday April 04, 2019 @10:44AM (#19572893)
The only thing the democracy index gets right are the broad strokes. But then again, so could a high schooler with wikipedia and a free afternoon.

It's not implemented well enough to detect the fine differences between western countries.

Hate speech laws reduce the range of discourse. They suppress dissent. That's inherently undemocratic.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A16Z is re-registering as a financial advisor, renouncing... by late2part on Friday April 05, 2019 @11:41PM (#19589057)
I think the reason so many people feel that it's important to allow dissenting and objectionable speech is that the perception of 'harmful' speech is mostly subjective.

Relegating that permissiveness to a particular entity allows that subjectivity to be enforced in perverse ways.

Many people feel it is better to tolerate the objectionable and hurtful speech than to allow a 3rd party to use subjective judgment to censor.

[ Parent | on HN ]