Re:What comes after open source
by steveklabnik on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @02:51PM
(#19557370)
Here's a recent HN discussion about unions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19433610
You can read the thread and draw your own conclusions. My impression is taken from reading a number of these threads over years; I could be wrong!
Re:What comes after open source
by morenoh149 on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @05:16PM
(#19558670)
My guess is that that sentiment arises from the meritocratic attitude that if you are disproportionately talented you should be compensated much much more. And I get that. To a point.
I don't like when corporations collude to artificially suppress wages either. Or when information asymmetry is used to keep an engineer's salary low or prevent negotiating higher salaries.
I'll read that discussion.
Re:What comes after open source
by intelliderp on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @03:12PM
(#19557583)
Yeah, I'm apparently shadow-banned on HN for some users.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13564440
Arguments often encountered:
* Compensation/mobility is good enough not to need unions. * Workers don't have enough leverage to do anything anyway. * Unions restrict you in undesirable ways. * Unions are shady and corrupt.
I'll go on the record saying I'm pro dev union. Even if its just a glorified professional organization. I'd love to hear the holes in the argument.
The corporations are financially motivated to prevent unionization. If you want a piece of the future you have to be just as savvy.
One tricky bit is if unionizing just causes a massive exodus of development to offshore. Thoughts on that?