News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by isoskeles on Thursday March 28, 2019 @02:46PM (#19515249)
As self-serving as it is, iFixit is doing a social good IMO. If it weren't for them, I would have spent more money replacing or having someone else repair my iPhone. So I don't care if they make money off of it, they save me more money in the long-run, and they prevent a larger number of phones and other devices being cycled through the economy before necessary. If that means punching up at Apple, so be it. Apple can take the hit.

Planned obsolescence is a very shitty and cynical strategy on the part of manufacturers, and anyone fighting against it is on the right side.

Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by saagarjha on Thursday March 28, 2019 @04:33PM (#19516312)
> iFixit is doing a social good IMO

Agree.

> anyone fighting against it is on the right side

Don't. For example, Louis Rossmann recently kicked up a storm when he claimed that Apple used the customs to seize his "genuine" battery shipments (which was widely reported in the media and gave him significant publicity), except it turned out that he left out the fact that the parts were unauthorized: https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/9pow06/louis_rossman.... Self-serving PR stunts that consist of misinformation and depend on the subsequent media outrage don't help "the right side".

Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by mindslight on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:56PM (#19518199)
That reddit post you linked to also does its best to avoid focusing on the actual situation. There's no such thing as an "unauthorized" battery. If factories are producing batteries with a default Apple logo (ie to Chinese standards), and he's instructing them to cross it out, that also seems completely legitimate.
Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by saagarjha on Friday March 29, 2019 @01:02AM (#19519272)
> That reddit post you linked to also does its best to avoid focusing on the actual situation.

No, it doesn't. In fact, I think it's pretty explicit in making the situation clear:

> First of all, let me start by saying, I am not defending Apple's terrible stance towards Right to Repair.

> I think Apple's R2R policy is awful - It sucks that once the device you buy is on the "obsolete" list, you can no longer get 1st party service from Apple. Not only that, but there are no legal ways to obtain parts. IMO this is something all of us should be putting pressure on Apple to change. I'd love it if there was a law on the books that forced companies to make spare parts for products available to customers for x amount of years after the warranty expires. That would allow people to continue using the devices they buy.

> In closing, I'm going to continue supporting Louis, iFixit, and their attempts to secure our rights to repair the products we own.

But it is also very obvious that Louis Rossman was clearly dishonest. Actually, I don't quite understand your argument:

> If factories are producing batteries with a default Apple logo (ie to Chinese standards), and he's instructing them to cross it out, that also seems completely legitimate.

How is this "completely legitimate"? Apple is (quite understandably) annoyed that some factories decided to make batteries that Louis could peddle as genuine Apple batteries, when it's clear that they are in fact not these at all (they're crossing out the logos to pass customs, for heaven's sake). Of course they're going to be seized, because they're counterfeit: Apple probably wasn't even involved here. I'm surprised he has the gall to try to make this a huge PR issue by claiming that Apple was trying to stop him from repairing Macs with genuine batteries that he bought when he knows they're just shady batteries from China he's trying to bring into the country.

Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by brokenmachine on Thursday March 28, 2019 @07:58PM (#19517863)
What exactly does "unauthorized" mean in the context of spare parts?
Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by saagarjha on Friday March 29, 2019 @12:54AM (#19519244)
It means that the batteries were made without Apple's approval, but carried Apple's branding and were intended to be sold as genuine Apple batteries.
Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by isoskeles on Thursday March 28, 2019 @04:59PM (#19516535)
Hah, I should clarify that I don't think gratuitous lying is an acceptable way to fight.
Re:Internal Documents Show Apple Is Capable of Implementing ... by lightedman on Thursday March 28, 2019 @04:52PM (#19516482)
"Unauthorized" flies in the face of the anti-tying provisions of the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act.

Go read our laws and do try to keep up with them, eh? You're one of the reasons things like this are happening.