Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by shawnz on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:48AM
(#19511623)
What they are saying is that this isn't just "the wrong way to do it". It doesn't actually fix the problem it's supposed to fix, therefore it's actually wrong to say it's a functioning patch.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by Aeolun on Thursday March 28, 2019 @09:03AM
(#19511748)
Of course, but their boss doesn’t know that (or care about it), he just wants to see the fixed bug graph line approach the total bug graphline.
It’ll be totally explainable as engineer failure if something somehow doesn’t work.