Re:Meet Q, a Genderless Voice
by daeken on Wednesday March 27, 2019 @07:38PM
(#19507424)
Gender is not a biological concept, period; that's sex. Your body is also distinctly not "one or the other", given that a large portion of the world is born with one of several intersex conditions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> a large portion of the world is born with one of several intersex conditions
No, a very very small portion. Gender doesn't vary independently from sex, you'd be hard pressed to find a stronger correlation. It's misleading to consider them as totally separate things.
Re:Meet Q, a Genderless Voice
by rootusrootus on Wednesday March 27, 2019 @07:44PM
(#19507476)
I figured someone would try to bring up malfunctions. No, DNA is pretty clear on the whole male/female thing. Malfunctions are just that.
Redefining gender is an uphill battle. I won't wish you good luck in doing that, I'd prefer coming up with a new term for this goal.
Is DNA pretty clear on the whole male/female thing?
There is no such thing as a malfunction in genetics - every single biological property is the result of some imperfect copy some time in the past.
Re:Meet Q, a Genderless Voice
by freedomben on Wednesday March 27, 2019 @07:51PM
(#19507542)
> Your body is also distinctly not "one or the other", given that a large portion of the world is born with one of several intersex conditions.
What sort of "intersex conditions" are large portions of the world born with? What do you mean by "large portion?" Like 50%? 30%?
Happy to follow a link if you don't want to type it out and would rather paste a URL