News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by m1cky on Monday March 25, 2019 @07:19AM (#19481571)
The app utilises AES encryption method using this library: https://github.com/RNCryptor/RNCryptor.
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by danpalmer on Monday March 25, 2019 @08:37AM (#19481946)
Is the encryption end to end, or is the key known to the server?
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by aboutruby on Monday March 25, 2019 @08:54AM (#19482036)
Seems like there is a "password" required to encrypt/decrypt but the app's descriptions says:

> - No Sign Up / Log In / Usernames / Passwords.

So I'm guessing this password is stored server-side and the passwords are associated to device ids.

Seems like it would read your contacts and then send them to their servers too, not a fan of doing that personally.

I'm not sure why the app mentions encryption/security as it seems far from being the main point of the app.

Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by m1cky on Monday March 25, 2019 @10:25AM (#19482627)
Messages sent on the app are end-to-end encrypted and the key is not known to the server. The only way anybody can read your messages is if you allow them physical access to your phone.
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by indutny on Monday March 25, 2019 @08:31AM (#19481917)
Any additional details on how encryption and key generation scheme looks like?
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by kelnage on Monday March 25, 2019 @08:54AM (#19482035)
Or, more importantly, how does key exchange work? You can’t really claim to be totally anonymous without explaining these details.
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by i_am_proteus on Monday March 25, 2019 @10:25AM (#19482624)
How does key exchange work, and does the server have copies of the keys?
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by m1cky on Monday March 25, 2019 @01:33PM (#19484590)
You can find more info on key exchange here - https://github.com/RNCryptor/RNCryptor.

The server does not have copies.

Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by kelnage on Monday March 25, 2019 @05:15PM (#19486809)
No, you really can’t. That’s a library for symmetric cryptography. The key distribution/exchange problem cannot be solved with symmetric cryptography alone - unless you are acting as a trusted party and conveying the symmetric key - in which case you are not implementing end-to-end cryptography.
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by chupa-chups on Monday March 25, 2019 @07:22AM (#19481581)
Thanks for the answer! The app looks really nice. Will try it :)
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by m1cky on Monday March 25, 2019 @07:26AM (#19481611)
Thanks! Let me know if you have any questions.

P.S. Get a friend to download it as well as it requires both parties to have each other contacts saved and the app installed in order to send / receive messages.

Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by a-priori on Monday March 25, 2019 @10:40AM (#19482794)
In other words you have to harvest the parties' contact lists in order to do this matching?
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by m1cky on Monday March 25, 2019 @11:11AM (#19483156)
We require access to your contacts. We do not harvest.
Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by a-priori on Monday March 25, 2019 @11:16AM (#19483219)
Could you explain the difference, in your own words?

The most obvious way I see to support this feature is to build up a big table of contact connections, so that when I join and put in my phone number it can send up my list of contacts and find all the bidirectional connections to what's already in the database.

This means you're building up a big graph of how all your users are connected to each other, and to people who don't use Wave (yet). Is that not 'harvesting' the contacts? Do you do it a different way?

Re:Wave – A private and unique messenger for iOS by m1cky on Monday March 25, 2019 @01:29PM (#19484541)
The app requires an active number in order to use the service. This number is submitted to the database during the verification process. To my knowledge, mthere is no way around this.

To send and receive messages, the app needs access to your contacts. When you tap 'send' for the first time, the app will ask you for permission to access your address book.