News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Remembering the burglary that broke Cointelpro by ceejayoz on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:28AM (#19389006)
> The funny thing is that in this case and another nsl case, the FBI later dropped the request, making it difficult to sue.

This is a very frustrating aspect of our legal system - there's often not a good way to get a "sure, you stopped, but you shouldn't have done that in the first place, and you'll be in serious trouble if you try it again" sort or ruling.

Re:Remembering the burglary that broke Cointelpro by Nasrudith on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:08AM (#19389313)
The issue is of standards and norms. People in power are held to defacto lesser standards when they should be held to more stringent ones. It isn't just those self interested in it like say judges who do coke giving a slap on the wrist to coke dealers while giving LSD dealers life sentences because they use one and counterculture uses the other but common people who buy into the "shouldn't have Xed to not be murdered".

If they were held to the same standards as even the average middle class misconduct it would be a non-issue because everyone responsible would be in jail.

The harsh truth in spite of any claimed lofty ideals power is all that matters for rights in practice. Long have people gotten into far more legal trouble for punching an obnoxious drunk than beating their kids. We can and should fight relentlessly and mercilessly against this.

Re:Remembering the burglary that broke Cointelpro by schoen on Thursday March 14, 2019 @02:38PM (#19392102)
There is a "capable of repetition evading review" standard meant to deal with this situation (to some extent).

https://duckduckgo.com/?q="capable+of+repetition+evading+rev...

Re:Remembering the burglary that broke Cointelpro by mindslight on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:54AM (#19389203)
Or more appropriately, the standard "you violated the law, so you're going to jail".