[this source]: https://www.aviationpros.com/home/press-release/10393553/mac...
Look at the cockpit of a DC-3 or pretty much anything pre-war design that doesn’t use a stick.. it will educate you.
Also, Boeing is a multi billion dollar company.. if they’re going to shill I’m sure they’d have no trouble finding an actual pilot to do it for them. We’re not that rare.
Boeing had already fix in the pipeline (software fix and different instructions for pilots, updating the manual) but government shutdown seems to have delayed the FAA approval process.
To the statisticians of HN: I am genuinely curious. What are the odds of that? Do we model it as Poisson?
So, assuming an accident probability of 1/10000000 for each flight, and assuming that each flight is an independent event, then the probability of getting 2 or more accidents in 150k flights of normally functioning planes is 1/8978.23, if I've done the math correctly.
The probability of 1 or more accidents in 150k flights is 1/67.1679.
I have no idea how to interpret this. One of the challenges in statistics is asking the right questions, and I'm not sure that the questions I've answered are the right questions.
Edit: here is a video of the trim wheel on a 737-300 https://vimeo.com/34501723
If you're mostly surrounded by boeing equipment for most of your career then it's likely to use the terminology that they use.
I'm also very skeptical of his thesis that these accidents were pilot error, that there is nothing different about the Max 8 than any previous generation of the 737. The 737 in general has an excellent safety record. The Max 8 has had two crashes within two years of its introduction. The odds of that just being a coincidence are pretty damn low.
So I can't help but wonder if this guy is a shill. Maybe the question we should be asking is: can pilots trust Boeing?