Re:Market Concentration Is Threatening the US Economy
by fiter on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @01:29PM
(#19381126)
Do you think monopolies like PG&E in California are well-regulated? If not, could you tell me why this isn't due to systemic difficulties in setting up a well-regulated monopoly?
EDIT: I should put my thesis in here: It is easy for regulatory capture to happen in the case of monopoly and regulator. I would also expect the monopoly plus regulator to perform more poorly than either a competitive company or a public entity.
Re:Market Concentration Is Threatening the US Economy
by digitaltrees on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @05:36PM
(#19384121)
Regulation generally is not the same as regulation specifically related to antitrust. You can create a well regulated monopoly where none of the regulations are designed to prevent negative effects of being a monopoly.
Re:Market Concentration Is Threatening the US Economy
by ishjoh on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @03:12PM
(#19382422)
The hardest part of regulation is not erecting artificial barriers to entry.
There are a lot of examples where regulatory capture happens to ensure that a near monopoly can comfortably maintain its position, and it strangles competition from startups.
Re:Market Concentration Is Threatening the US Economy
by digitaltrees on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @05:37PM
(#19384129)
Target antitrust.
The less concentrated the market, the less regulation required because natural market forces will have larger impacts. Once a corporation reaches a significant size, they largely outgrow the market being able to influence them in a large way, hence the need for more (and stricter) regulation.
Monopolies, if well-regulated, aren't as evil as they seem.