News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Serious Chrome zero-day by blattimwind on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @04:31PM (#19323029)
> Does anyone actually use this abbreviation?

More common in plural (vulns). However, it sounds oddly vulgar in my ears.

Re:Serious Chrome zero-day by DC-3 on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @04:35PM (#19323077)
It's weird because when you read vulnerability (or at least when I say it) the first phoneme effectively becomes 'vun' - but in the abbreviated form one feels the need to mentally enunciate the 'l'.
Re:Serious Chrome zero-day by qu4z-2 on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @05:48PM (#19323764)
I think the dropped l might just be your locale. I certainly pronounce it in the full word.
Re:Serious Chrome zero-day by hopler on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @05:15PM (#19323445)
It's because vul-ner-a-bil-i-ty is being chopped in the middle of a syllable "ner",

"Vulner" is more pleasant than "vuln"

Re:Serious Chrome zero-day by uniformlyrandom on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @04:54PM (#19323260)
> oddly vulgar

My initial reaction was 'linguistically disgusting', but I decided to hold off the opinion, just in case I am strangely illiterate.

Re:Serious Chrome zero-day by diminoten on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @04:36PM (#19323094)
I've typed it, but I dunno if I've ever said it out loud. Kind of like i18n.
Re:Serious Chrome zero-day by __jal on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @05:00PM (#19323326)
Same here. It is used internally here as a written abbreviation, and we use it as a prefix in a numbering scheme to identify a certain category of defects, but I don't think I've ever heard anyone use it verbally.