Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments
by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @07:53AM
(#19238390)
What exactly are you saying is a lie?
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments
by jjoonathan on Sunday February 24, 2019 @12:31PM
(#19239498)
Exactly what he said was a lie.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments
by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @12:37PM
(#19239536)
The only thing he mentions is the Russian addresses, which I haven't seen anybody disputing. Do you think there weren't that amount of comments with Russian addresses?
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments
by jjoonathan on Sunday February 24, 2019 @01:30PM
(#19239822)
Nobody's disputing it except for you.
> What exactly are you saying is a lie?
> I'd like you to point to a single lie, since you're asserting that he lied without pointing to any.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments
by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @02:04PM
(#19240008)
Again, what specifically is a lie and why do you think it's a lie?
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments
by jjoonathan on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:47PM
(#19258586)
Sitkack's comment was specific. Read it.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments
by ikeboy on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:54PM
(#19258640)
The "they" is ambiguous, and the statement it's referring to is ambiguous as well. That's why I asked for clarification multiple times, the refusal to do so is incredibly suspicious.
The State of NY and the FBI cannot comment because of ongoing investigations... How about the FBI interviews Ajit Pai, who can't not lie, and they throw him in jail just like Martha Stewart.
What CQ did and what the FCC is help hide is felony impersonation in most states. Each occurrence (sounds like there was at least 8k from the WSJ investigation) could be a felony.