News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by sitkack on Sunday February 24, 2019 @07:19AM (#19238301)
It isn't just that CQ stuffs the ballot box with false statements, it looks like the FCC is complicit in hiding it as well, then Ajit goes on record saying it is the Russians. How much lying can they do? That was rhetorical, I believe there is no upper bound.

The State of NY and the FBI cannot comment because of ongoing investigations... How about the FBI interviews Ajit Pai, who can't not lie, and they throw him in jail just like Martha Stewart.

What CQ did and what the FCC is help hide is felony impersonation in most states. Each occurrence (sounds like there was at least 8k from the WSJ investigation) could be a felony.

Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @07:53AM (#19238390)
What exactly are you saying is a lie?
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by jjoonathan on Sunday February 24, 2019 @12:31PM (#19239498)
Exactly what he said was a lie.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @12:37PM (#19239536)
The only thing he mentions is the Russian addresses, which I haven't seen anybody disputing. Do you think there weren't that amount of comments with Russian addresses?
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by jjoonathan on Sunday February 24, 2019 @01:30PM (#19239822)
Nobody's disputing it except for you.

> What exactly are you saying is a lie?

> I'd like you to point to a single lie, since you're asserting that he lied without pointing to any.

Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @02:04PM (#19240008)
Again, what specifically is a lie and why do you think it's a lie?
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by jjoonathan on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:47PM (#19258586)
Sitkack's comment was specific. Read it.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:54PM (#19258640)
The "they" is ambiguous, and the statement it's referring to is ambiguous as well. That's why I asked for clarification multiple times, the refusal to do so is incredibly suspicious.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by sitkack on Sunday February 24, 2019 @10:03AM (#19238781)
How about we enumerate the truth, a much more tractable endeavor.

You can make as many leaf comments as your karma allows but isn’t going to change anything.

Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @10:20AM (#19238857)
I'd like you to point to a single lie, since you're asserting that he lied without pointing to any.