News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments. Parent comment

Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @12:37PM (#19239536)
The only thing he mentions is the Russian addresses, which I haven't seen anybody disputing. Do you think there weren't that amount of comments with Russian addresses?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by jjoonathan on Sunday February 24, 2019 @01:30PM (#19239822)
Nobody's disputing it except for you.

> What exactly are you saying is a lie?

> I'd like you to point to a single lie, since you're asserting that he lied without pointing to any.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Sunday February 24, 2019 @02:04PM (#19240008)
Again, what specifically is a lie and why do you think it's a lie?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by jjoonathan on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:47PM (#19258586)
Sitkack's comment was specific. Read it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by ikeboy on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:54PM (#19258640)
The "they" is ambiguous, and the statement it's referring to is ambiguous as well. That's why I asked for clarification multiple times, the refusal to do so is incredibly suspicious.
[ Parent | on HN ]