"But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."
-- Carl Sagan
Going to share another quote, which I think is relative here -
“Those who are crazy enough to think they can change the world usually do.” - Steve Jobs
Of course, if you don't ever try it, you can never be right for any reasons.
Bitcoin is IMO likely somewhere in between. It kickstarted a new concept in IT but money is a really simple (although powerful) usecase. I'm more interested what will be done with the concept in the future.
He wasn't even right. He was wrong in his estimation of the earth circumference, and lucky that America was there between both oceans...
That's really rude.
* Mining has become highly centralized, the opposite of its original intent.
* Transaction fees are too high to justify its use in every day transactions and small transfers.
* Very few merchants accept it for every day transactions, and the number has decreased over time.
As an idea, a hope, the starting point for iterating on the future of money.
As a way to make the society think and debate.
And as all that, I think it had been successful.
Generally though, merchants wouldn't bother accepting it. Alongside the fees and whatnot, adoption is too low, fees are too high, time to confirm is too high, and it can complicate some legal stuff (like issuing VAT invoices).
Despite being a dominant force in film, they're selling poorly today.
My family and friends said i was stupid, utopist, being conned, wasting my time, and so lany things.
Btc was banana money at first, and only people believing it would be a great thing as a concept made it work. We didn't expect to make banks, it was a happy side effect of a mad naive bet.
All great things start like that. Comics are now the thing, but 20 years ago were still for pationate nerds.