Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by diegoperini on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:42AM
(#19190534)
Windows Photos is having a hard time despite my strong specs. Any alternative to use aside from browsers?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by WalterSobchak on Monday February 18, 2019 @01:09PM
(#19192720)
I've tried most alternatives for Windows, and the best I've found is Nomacs[1]. It's very fast and customizable.
nomacs is a free, open source image viewer, which supports multiple platforms. You can use it for viewing all common image formats including RAW and psd images.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by cmpb on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:46AM
(#19190547)
Irfanview seems to handle it decently well
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by geolgau on Monday February 18, 2019 @10:13AM
(#19191179)
This makes me lose my shit every time I want to see a simple jpg image in Windows 10. WHY?? Even my 14 year old linux laptop can open 100+ MB images faster than W10.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by sevensor on Monday February 18, 2019 @10:48AM
(#19191473)
Viewnior barely breaks a sweat on my (powerful by 2014 standards) machine
%CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
2.8 1.6 823764 277528 pts/6 Sl+ 0:06 viewnior updated mosaic.png
That's about 804 megabytes allocated, 271 megabytes resident. Took about 2 seconds to read and render the file.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by AmVess on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:19PM
(#19195391)
Components of the OS are 20+ years old, it seems. The image handler is one of them. Simply right clicking on it takes 12 seconds for the menu to pop up.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by Avamander on Monday February 18, 2019 @09:41AM
(#19190854)
Anyone knows of a GPU accelerated Linux image viewer?
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by bratch on Monday February 18, 2019 @02:31PM
(#19193545)
GLiv [1]. Firefox and GLiv both take ~5 seconds to load the image for me, although whilst Firefox takes another ~5 seconds to re-render after zooming in to 100 %, GLiv is instant.