Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by laveur on Sunday February 17, 2019 @08:02PM
(#19187963)
Apparently the SSL cert for this got revoked... I wonder if anyone at nasa knows...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by bikezen on Sunday February 17, 2019 @11:58PM
(#19188738)
JPLer here, digicert revoked 90%+ of our certs in some form of user error on their end. We have a self-service tool that anyone on lab can request a cert from, even for internal only stuff its externally trusted so there's thousands of certs issued through them. All *.jpl.nasa.gov certs got revoked, lots of other sub-domains did too.
That was a fun day having people re-issue thousands of certificates. Not surprised some stuff still hasn't been noticed.
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by WestCoastJustin on Monday February 18, 2019 @01:01AM
(#19188903)
HN is pretty hilarious at times. I love when things like this happen (a peek behind the scenes with added context). You get it right from someone who works there! Amazing.
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by ynoclo on Sunday February 17, 2019 @09:22PM
(#19188218)
crt.sh reports that JPL's wildcard certificate was revoked on 2019-01-15: https://crt.sh/?id=273042821
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by Alupis on Sunday February 17, 2019 @08:21PM
(#19188028)
Looks valid on my machine (win10, chrome)
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by segfaultbuserr on Sunday February 17, 2019 @11:13PM
(#19188597)
Because OCSP is not reliable. Yeah, SSL/TLS is still broken at large, can you believe it, by default, there is NO reliable way to revoke a certificate... If OCSP times out, it just times out, the browser simply ignores it and loads the page without warnings. Active attackers can just block the OCSP server before they can use a revoked certificate with leaked private key to launch a MITM attack.
This is why we need OCSP pinning and OCSP Must Staple. OCSP pinning makes the web server itself to delegate OCSP responses in-band, thus eliminates the need for clients to make an unreliable connection to a 3rd-party, improves both security and performance. OCSP Must Staple is a certificate attribute that forces the browser to enforce pinned OCSP checkings. This is also the reason that Let's Encrypt limits the certificate lifetime to 90 days.
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by cbsks on Sunday February 17, 2019 @08:45PM
(#19188108)
Safari on iOS does not trust the certificate
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by brandonjm on Sunday February 17, 2019 @09:23PM
(#19188221)
Safari, Chrome and Firefox all do not trust it on macOS as well.
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by saagarjha on Sunday February 17, 2019 @11:48PM
(#19188713)
My Safari does, to give another viewpoint.
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by segfaultbuserr on Sunday February 17, 2019 @11:12PM
(#19188591)
Probably during the government shutdown.
Re:JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming L...
by MastrChefRocks on Sunday February 17, 2019 @09:15PM
(#19188197)
Firefox on Android is fine with it