Re:What every physicist should know about string theory
by mcnamaratw on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:50PM
(#19140333)
Laypeople can go ahead and express opinions about physics they don't understand, in exactly the same way a layperson can read HN and then go on to express opinions about the merits of Java vs Ruby without ever trying either language. It's a little bit silly, though.
Re:What every physicist should know about string theory
by goatlover on Monday February 11, 2019 @11:01PM
(#19140940)
Wait, is Java point particles and Ruby superstrings, with LISP being quantum fields?
Re:What every physicist should know about string theory
by mcnamaratw on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @07:51AM
(#19152630)
Sure! Any two things I don't understand are equivalent to me!
Poster you're replying to admits they're a layman. As am I.
Perhaps the people writing articles for the laymen should do a better job explaining the redeeming aspects of String Theory. Because like the OP, I too have been left with the impression (from reading articles targeting laymen) that String Theory is clever math in search of a reality it can describe.