Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by arpa on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:15AM
(#19134191)
Apparently it is somehow possible to produce a HTTP 500 with pure HTML and CSS!
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by matt_the_bass on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:38AM
(#19134357)
I loved your comment. I know that your comment is somewhat against the spirit of HN in that it’s not really constructive, but i still liked it.
I’m curious if you’d be willing to share roughly how many votes it earned you? I wonder how the rest of the community responded to it.
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by arpa on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:47AM
(#19134406)
Thank you. I won't go into specifics, but surprisingly it was much better received than my claims that one can actually have self-hosted mail system that does not deliver your mail straight into gmails' spam folder.
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by captainbland on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:38AM
(#19134351)
Actually even more impressively there doesn't appear to be any CSS on that page at all!
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by arpa on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:47AM
(#19134409)
Pure magic!
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by pmlnr on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:26AM
(#19134267)
Same here. Funny to see how the /. effect - or, in this case, the hug of hn - still kills websites when cache plugins, static sites, varnish (sw), nginx fastcgi cache are all available and fairly simple to set up.
I blame wordpress for not shipping with built-in microcaching.
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by ComputerGuru on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:39AM
(#19134360)
> I blame wordpress for not shipping with built-in microcaching.
Only it’s not a WordPress site.
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by pmlnr on Monday February 11, 2019 @02:38PM
(#19137538)
I meant generally, but fair point.
Re:Tasks That Can Be Done with Pure HTML and CSS
by kevincox on Monday February 11, 2019 @08:18AM
(#19134213)
It appears to have been a small hiccup. It's loaded for me after a refresh.
Just error for me.