News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on No Thank You, Mr. Pecker. Parent comment

Re:No Thank You, Mr. Pecker by hypochondria on Thursday February 07, 2019 @07:13PM (#19110017)
> They are threatening to post photos of him sexting.

Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so far which already got people thinking about him sexting anyway combined with losing custody of ~70 billion dollars in the coming divorce? I'm not so sure. Their privacy was already thoroughly invaded before this latest development.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:No Thank You, Mr. Pecker by reitzensteinm on Thursday February 07, 2019 @07:55PM (#19110277)
It doesn't matter if it's worse. Going through a public divorce doesn't make one stop caring about an invasion of sexual privacy. It doesn't work like that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:No Thank You, Mr. Pecker by markbnj on Friday February 08, 2019 @02:21AM (#19112181)
> Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so far which already got people thinking about him sexting anyway

Yes, unequivocally. I suspect any PR person would agree. You can doubt information published by a disreputable source, but most people believe the images they see, even in this deep faked era.

[ Parent | on HN ]