hypochondria
Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so far which already got people thinking about him sexting anyway combined with losing custody of ~70 billion dollars in the coming divorce? I'm not so sure. Their privacy was already thoroughly invaded before this latest development.
That's a flask, not a beaker.
What?
Thank you for the clear example. I think this context really helps people understand the conversation better.
For clarity, could you give an example of a sign that changes to mean a different word or phrase depending on facial expression?
> But deaf people aren't actually that keen on these solutions
People often aren't keen on solutions that are either still nascent or that they haven't given a chance yet. My mom wasn't keen on navigating with a GPS until she had one in her car and it changed her life. Not being keen is not on its own a great reason to dismiss a technology. The reason matters.
IMO a more meaningful statement might be to say that the obvious alternative is simply a small keyboard, which already exists.
But they literally say exactly this. Do you immediately stop reading after just the one word next to the graphic? Do the rest of the words mean nothing?
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/missi...
I assume that they're complicitly contributing to the production of public mirth. It's really funny seeing people walking around the streets of Paris when it's +15C out with their giant parkas on.
Evolution theory has no bearing whatsoever on critical moral and philosophical concepts like whether you should be allowed to prevent others from conforming to an API.