Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by bluedino on Saturday February 02, 2019 @03:32PM
(#19065512)
Slashdot posters would use ^H^H in their posts (backspace)
Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by lscotte on Saturday February 02, 2019 @04:33PM
(#19065871)
It goes back way further than that - probably to the dawn of IRC or so.
Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by pjscott on Saturday February 02, 2019 @05:56PM
(#19066347)
I believe it dates back to the unix talk(1) program, quite a bit earlier than IRC.
Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by TheCondor on Saturday February 02, 2019 @09:02PM
(#19067307)
It’s from the dec terminal emulation, VT100. I think specifically when you connected to like an ansi type system with dec mode. Or something like that, the memories are fuzzy
Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by lscotte on Friday February 08, 2019 @08:16AM
(#19113814)
The keystroke certainly does, but I was talking about people inserting ^h and ^w in the middle of conversations, which is a bit harder to nail down, though the practice is older than the parent thought.
Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by mark-r on Saturday February 02, 2019 @10:17PM
(#19067594)
^H was backspace on teletypes, which probably dates back to the 1960's.
Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by Klathmon on Saturday February 02, 2019 @03:29PM
(#19065492)
Ah okay makes sense! It's amazing the gaps in knowledge I still have with a lot of things.
I've used Linux daily for like 15 years now, and I know about control characters, but since I never really used emacs (or readline beyond the copy+pasted command here or there) I just completely missed the meaning.
Re:Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 ‘Kittson’ Processor, th...
by yuubi on Saturday February 02, 2019 @10:40PM
(#19067694)
Not emacs (it means kill-region there, which deletes the text between the cursor and the mark and saves it in a holding area, fairly close to what windows does when you hit ^x, except the holding area is fancier).
This readline behavior follows a Unix tty driver. I'm not sure off the top of my head which one introduced it. I don't think it was on xenix but am pretty sure some 4.x bsd had it.
'^W' is what would appear instead if you weren't in a readline/emacs editor, but instead a dumb line terminal. Thus, leaving '^W' behind makes it look like you didn't realize what you just corrected is still visible.
It's a joke. I've now explained and ruined it.