News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The cult of rotary mixers by monadgonad on Thursday January 24, 2019 @02:19AM (#18986625)
> It's like the difference between driving a Mazda and a Porsche

You mean Honda? Bit of an odd comparison when the Mazda MX5/Miata is one of the most well-known fun drives.

Re:The cult of rotary mixers by whatusername on Thursday January 24, 2019 @08:40AM (#18988531)
Not to mention the RX7/RX8.. (Given we are talking about "rotaries")
Re:The cult of rotary mixers by vinay427 on Thursday January 24, 2019 @02:50AM (#18986769)
Well, you picked the other company that is most known for an extremely fun relatively affordable car: the S2000 :)

I feel like neither Mazda nor Honda are appropriate here, anyway.

Re:The cult of rotary mixers by lisper on Thursday January 24, 2019 @02:58AM (#18986797)
I nominate Acura as the nameplate with the least fun to drive cars.
Re:The cult of rotary mixers by ams6110 on Thursday January 24, 2019 @03:18AM (#18986893)
I nominate Buick.
Re:The cult of rotary mixers by namdnay on Thursday January 24, 2019 @05:23AM (#18987436)
Dacia all the way

(not that they're bad cars)

Re:The cult of rotary mixers by lisper on Thursday January 24, 2019 @05:43AM (#18987519)
Acuras aren't bad cars. In fact, they are quite good. Comfortable. Well-designed. Efficient. Reliable. And incredibly boring (except the NSX, of course, but that doesn't really count because it is so utterly unlike all of the other cars in their lineup).
Re:The cult of rotary mixers by vinay427 on Friday January 25, 2019 @12:14AM (#18995742)
Also, the NSX is a Honda in most markets, as was the TSX, and both were more exciting than the average Acura.