Re:Adding new DNA letters makes novel proteins possible
by asdff on Thursday January 17, 2019 @09:17PM
(#18936512)
I see what you are getting at, but I think what the other comments are saying is that for the third nucleotide position of a given codon, it does not matter which nucleotide this is. The amino acid to be used would only depend on the first two nucleotides, while the third nucleotide can be AUCG.
Re:Adding new DNA letters makes novel proteins possible
by adrianratnapala on Thursday January 17, 2019 @10:49PM
(#18936883)
Nah, I misunderstood completely.
I was thinking of how a hypothetical code might, in the abstract have evolved from binary, through ternary up to the (current base-4).
I haven't got enough biochem knowledge to speculate how three nucleotides per amino acid can evolve to have three.
A translational reading frame consists of non-overlapping codons of three nucleotides. If one nucleotide is skipped, the entire downstream message is thus garbled. So how would the translational machinery operate if each codon arbitrarily consisted of two or three nucleotides?