Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by pelario on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @10:20AM
(#18921530)
I've thought the same (and heard the same booking "blunder"), until I visited a city I had visited before, and went for the exact same hotel...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by dhimes on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @11:02AM
(#18921952)
But did you need an ad to get you to do that? Seems like that's the one ad you don't need to see.
Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by JAlexoid on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @12:06PM
(#18922538)
That depends on where you see that ad. If you search for that particular hotel on Google, it's going to have an ad from N online travel agencies(OTA).
If you do a broad search on OTA website, then you're likely to book the same hotel that you stayed last time... Thus pushing it up is a great way of getting you to book... But that depends on how much the hotel is contributing in marketing
Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by TuringTest on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @10:45AM
(#18921788)
Surely that would make sense the next time you visit the city, not for the same visit.
Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by bdamm on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @10:57AM
(#18921907)
There’s some marketing theory about brand reinforcement near a purchase creating a more likely customer later. I’m not a marketer though.
Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by maxxxxx on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @12:48PM
(#18923009)
The easiest way to get "brand reinforcement" is to deliver a good product. I will remember them. Right now it seems they want to get "brand reinforcement" through constant nagging which already causes me to dislike the brand.