News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Steve Jobs on why Xerox failed by saurik on Monday January 07, 2019 @07:25AM (#18844618)
> I'm referring to the Apple Watch equipped with a non-invasive glucose sensor.

As someone who has dated someone that is diabetic and now works with someone who is diabetic--someone who likes to sit at the cutting edge of technology and is even using hacked equipment to improve his experience--I don't think we have that technology yet.

Re:Steve Jobs on why Xerox failed by jf- on Monday January 07, 2019 @08:11AM (#18844823)
We don’t, the latest commercial technology consists of disposable sensors that require a probe to penetrate the skin. Whoever brings something non-invasive (and reusable) to market will be raking it in whether they’re apple or not.
Re:Steve Jobs on why Xerox failed by bagsvaerd70 on Monday January 07, 2019 @08:16AM (#18844851)
PKVitality has a sensor array that is pretty much non-invasive: https://www.pkvitality.com/ktrack-glucose/

There's also an alternative using radiofrequency: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4641327/

Re:Steve Jobs on why Xerox failed by fabricexpert on Monday January 07, 2019 @08:41AM (#18844959)
> PKVitality

That product doesn't exist yet, the video on the home page is 18 months old so it's probably not feasible / accurate.