News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Flat Design vs. Traditional Design: Comparative Experimen... by Gibbon1 on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:42AM (#18804803)
It's kind of remarkable considering the UI did that decades after it became obvious that modernism is a disaster.
Re:Flat Design vs. Traditional Design: Comparative Experimen... by Randomswiss on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @04:18AM (#18805086)
Can you explain why modernism is an "obvious disaster"?
Re:Flat Design vs. Traditional Design: Comparative Experimen... by pjc50 on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @04:45AM (#18805172)
The "machine for living" philosophy is intended to be ergonomic, but is extremely rigid and therefore as soon as there are unanticipated needs it ends up anti-ergonomic.

There is also a great tendency for modern architecture to be selected purely based on looks, which produces all kinds of strange anti-egonomic disasters. Libraries that echo. Office blocks that focus the sun onto random burning spots on the street.

Then there's the effect of anti-ornamentation on the human psyche. I seem to remember that one of the modernist car parks in Britain was demolished partly because too many people were committing suicide from it.

Re:Flat Design vs. Traditional Design: Comparative Experimen... by buboard on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @04:52AM (#18805196)