Re:Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis: AGI is nowhere close ...
by joe_the_user on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @08:14PM
(#18721682)
Oh, that just means I happen to write in clear, unidiomatic English ;-). Add just a smidgen of irregular usage, contemporary metaphors and such and things can go South pretty quickly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis: AGI is nowhere close ...
by barrkel on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @09:21PM
(#18722001)
That'll just be a training problem (often translation is driven from example texts that have lots of translations, and we have many of these for multi-national orgs like EU, which necessarily don't include a lot of colloquialisms), and the inconsistency isn't found because the models built don't extend all the way out to real world experiences (training) and recognizing text as a real world experience narrative. I think a much deeper network could do better but we don't know how to train them, we take way too long as it is.
Re:Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis: AGI is nowhere close ...
by narag on Thursday December 20, 2018 @04:59AM
(#18723666)
I've seen the evolution of translators and there is a big difference in results. We can try more convoluted examples.
Also do you think that every human can parse that contemporary metaphors better?