News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by IfOnlyYouKnew on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @09:41AM (#18715863)
Yes: why? Or better: what. As in: what are you trying to tell us? That private messages are publicly available information, anyway? Or friends list, when set to private?

But to fulfill your yearning, the original NYT report mentions “consent” 12 times: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/technology/facebook-priva...

(Although two of those mentions are in the context of “consent decree”, which arguably doesn’t make it look any better)

A taste:

“This is just giving third parties permission to harvest data without you being informed of it or giving consent to it,” said David Vladeck, who formerly ran the F.T.C.’s consumer protection bureau. “I don’t understand how this unconsented-to data harvesting can at all be justified under the consent decree.”

Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by jonathanehrlich on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @09:47AM (#18715902)
No where in this article do they say users gave consent to have their information shared which they were required to do before such services could be implemented. At best, that's bad reporting and misleading at worst it's an agenda.
Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by IfOnlyYouKnew on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @09:58AM (#18715973)
I really don’t think you are doing your employer any favors by your transparently obtuse attempts to misrepresent the actual content of the accusations.
Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by jonathanehrlich on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @10:12AM (#18716098)
i don't work for FB anymore. The content of the accusation leave out two critical pieces. 1. Users gave consent to share private information. 2. Only publicly available information was shared these partners. Those are pretty important omissions in my opinion.
Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by IfOnlyYouKnew on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @11:29AM (#18716784)
The article clearly says users did not consent. And even if they did, that would presumably clash with your other assertion, namely that “only publicly available information was shared”.

So I stand by my accusation that you are pretending to be stupid, because no person working at Facebook would really be unable to find the accusation of private data being shared in an article titled “Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ private messages”

Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by cryptonector on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @12:11PM (#18717199)
You seem to be asserting that you have knowledge of the situation, enough to dispute the article. And you're an ex-employee of FB. That's most interesting. What else can you tell us? Be detailed.
[dead]
Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by dang on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @12:30PM (#18717425)
Personal attacks will get you banned here. Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and post civilly and substantively, or not at all.
Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by nindalf on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @11:21AM (#18716710)
Thinly veiled insults at someone who used to work for facebook is hardly within the rules of HN. Let's not start flame wars.
Re:Facebook gave Spotify and Netflix access to users’ privat... by anonunt on Monday December 24, 2018 @07:13AM (#18751794)
I am sorry if i offend.. that is not the intention, this is an important question - is the naivety of the staff part of the problem?

maybe i am wrong but user blaming seems so very basic to me, and completely ignores how you are responsible for the things you create and the damage they do - and the false confidence or foolish acts they lead people into.

I would like to believe that on average we are ready to just not accept user blaming for privacy and security issues. if they are not qualified to wield the tools then we should not have given them out. as in: "blaming the user is an immature response" seems like a statement it should be okay to say.