Re:Super Micro says review found no malicious chips in mothe...
by stupidbird on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @09:58AM
(#18655679)
If newspapers were in it for the money they wouldn't be newspapers. It's not an incredibly lucrative business.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Super Micro says review found no malicious chips in mothe...
by usefulcat on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @10:07AM
(#18655738)
Correlation != causation. The fact that most newspapers aren't lucrative doesn't mean they don't value profit.
Re:Super Micro says review found no malicious chips in mothe...
by spac on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @10:25AM
(#18655883)
Bloomberg News is not a newspaper. The company makes money from selling terminals not news (although the terminal contains news, but it's easy to see that sensationalism is not what the customers pay for).
Re:Super Micro says review found no malicious chips in mothe...
by usefulcat on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @11:45AM
(#18656557)
No one had to pay to read the SuperMicro story (the original one that started all this).
Re:Super Micro says review found no malicious chips in mothe...
by stupidbird on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @03:43PM
(#18658662)
Sure, but they let everyone read this specific story for free. They could have easily kept it behind their paywall.
Overall Bloomberg as a company does not sustain itself on news revenue.