News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The -a to -z of Command-Line Options (2003) by bboreham on Monday December 10, 2018 @08:10AM (#18647613)
The Macintosh Programmers Workbench (MPW), the first IDE for Mac, had a command-line with a simple shell.

When I used it in 1986 it really needed a big machine, i.e. 512K RAM :-)

Re:The -a to -z of Command-Line Options (2003) by yourapostasy on Monday December 10, 2018 @11:17AM (#18648915)
MPW had an interesting way to ease GUI-centric users into its CLI-centric world. There was a mode you could trigger for commands that brought up a help-oriented GUI for the command to build the command argument list, which would then echo onto the command line. Depending upon who built the GUI, it was usually a less terse and friendlier help for new users than AIX's SMIT, for those who are familiar with that.

I sometimes wish there was an open source equivalent like that for Linux , but with live, interactive building of the command as the GUI options were manipulated so new users could get a feel for commands more readily. This would act as an intermediate help system for casual users that is friendlier than manpages, and more immediate than searching around the Net.

[1] https://www.macintoshrepository.org/1360-macintosh-programme...

Re:The -a to -z of Command-Line Options (2003) by int_19h on Monday December 10, 2018 @12:55PM (#18649726)
> There was a mode you could trigger for commands that brought up a help-oriented GUI for the command to build the command argument list, which would then echo onto the command line.

This still lives on in a sense. For example, in VSCode, many UI commands translate to executing shell code in its internal terminal (and you can see both the commands and the output).

Re:The -a to -z of Command-Line Options (2003) by chubot on Monday December 10, 2018 @01:05PM (#18649817)
Thanks, I'm pretty sure that's what Stephenson mentioned in his essay / book.