For that matter, ARM solutions could also be very competitive but seems to be overpriced by comparison to x86 for any server solution I've seen so far.
Intel at its core is a marketing company. If they also happen to have the best tech that is nice too but not a necessity.
That's an absurd hyperbole.
Intel inside is great marketing and creating different brands of processors like i7 vs i3 independent of form factor pulls the focus away from absolute performance. Getting software manufacturers to customize for your chip again gets out of playing the actual head to head game.
It would be interesting to hear your other adages if this is anything to go by.
Given they’ve led the charge technologically in CPUs for decades this is extremely high praise. I think people are taking this as suggesting Intel does not innovate technologically which is not the case.
The video provides evidence of the tech being nice but not required. They openly admit their CPU was “a dog” and all the software people hated it. Yet their strategy of going around them to management worked perfectly.
People forget how awful segmented 16-bit was. And other CPUs like the 68000 and Alpha were faster at various points in time.
Is is probably a safe bet to ignore any news from there until they actually deliver anything and read independent benchmarks.
It is really sad, they used to be very correct in their communication.