Face it. Blockchain is going nowhere. It was stillborn the day it was created. It's had 10 years and nothing about it has fundamentally changed (as many bitcoin advocates love to point out as if it was a positive thing).
Normal people who say "yeah, blockchain might have a use" are just being polite. They don't want to state the obvious. Beyond its current use case as a magnet for scams, fraud, pump & dumps and get rich quick schemes there is no use for the blockchain at all.
The usecase is censorship resistant financial transactions.
It is working right now, for people in Venezuela, for example. It is working for people who are attempting to make financial transactions, across the world, quickly and cheaply.
Tell me a better way to make censorship resistant financial transactions, over the internet, if you think this is useless.
A ledger is all it is, not an "app".
Many games can be implemented as a blockchain
Evidence:
Ledgers have been implemented as a blockchain
There you go. Now the burden is on you to provide evidence that it’s impossible for any game other than a ledger to be implemented as a blockchain.
I'm sorry to be snarky but if this level of reasoning is representative of the cryptocurrency community then there's a reason it's failing.
That’s pretty mean. I tried to engage your criticism in good faith, and you’re treating me like I’m too dumb to even talk to.
Feels bad.
There will be more, but the design process is hard. The reason Ledger was cracked first is because ledgers are pretty simple.
Saying blockchain is “just a ledger” is like saying the web is “just a bunch of nerds uploading documents about their hobbies”. That’s where it started but after many years we learned to solve other problems with the same ideas.