Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by pjc50 on Thursday December 06, 2018 @03:34PM
(#18621924)
That's a horrifyingly large amount of coal there for a developed country.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by shard972 on Thursday December 06, 2018 @11:46PM
(#18625212)
Because the left in Australia is deathly afraid of nuclear and the right finds that it constituents are those who work in coal, one of our major industries.
Our largest 3rd party, the greens just won't even consider nuclear, to them it's solar/wind or bust.
Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by pjc50 on Friday December 07, 2018 @04:19AM
(#18626192)
Yes, what would a country with a "sunshine coast" that is continually engaged in trying to keep the powerful rays of the sun off its skin want with solar power?
Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by frankietwenty9 on Friday December 07, 2018 @01:27AM
(#18625581)
Nuclear would be ridiculously expensive for Australia. Renewables and gas would be achievable in under 10 years.
Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by haihaibye on Friday December 07, 2018 @05:04AM
(#18626376)
Australia has 34% of the world's low-cost uranium reserves.
Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by Tade0 on Friday December 07, 2018 @08:54AM
(#18627618)
Fueling a nuclear power plant is never expensive comparing to just about anything else there.
Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by grecy on Friday December 07, 2018 @12:03AM
(#18625276)
...and the government continually talks about building more coal! They love to call it "clean coal" and ramble about it every month or two.
Of course, they have not actually done anything at all, which is the definition of Australian politics.