News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go 2, here we come by pjmlp on Thursday November 29, 2018 @12:35PM (#18561959)
Languages are products as well, either they grow to fulfil the needs of their customers or their fade away.
Re:Go 2, here we come by ilovecaching on Thursday November 29, 2018 @07:32PM (#18565573)
What if the need is for a small language without generics?
Re:Go 2, here we come by pjmlp on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:58AM (#18567070)
If there was such a need, the languages without them would still have a major market, which isn't the case.

Naturally those of us coding since the early days have experience with programming languages without generics support, yet a large majority eventually adopted generics.

Even C has minimal generics support since C11.

Re:Go 2, here we come by bluejekyll on Thursday November 29, 2018 @09:50PM (#18566217)
In what context would “need” a language to not have generics? I can understand not “wanting” generics to keep it simpler, but I can’t see that as a “need”.

Personally, in any typed language, I want generics, not having them feels very limiting.